Amazon’s Alexa+ Reaches 1M Users as Apple Siri Scrambles in AI Race

Amazon's Alexa Plus reaches over one million users, showing tangible progress while Apple's Siri overhaul stalls, revealing divergent strategies in the high-stakes AI assistant race.

Amazon’s generative AI-powered Alexa+ is making tangible progress in the fiercely competitive voice assistant arena, now reaching over one million users in its early access program. According to The Verge, the revamped assistant is being rolled out to customers at an “increasing pace,” with a broader public release planned for this summer. This milestone provides a stark contrast to Apple’s situation, where a crisis surrounding its own AI strategy has left the much-hyped overhaul of Siri stalled by significant technical failures.

The divergence between the two tech giants highlights the immense difficulty and differing strategies involved in deploying next-generation AI. While Amazon’s approach involves a gradual, public-facing rollout that is still working through bugs, Apple has been forced back to the drawing board. An attempt to merge modern generative AI with Siri’s aging framework was described by one source to Bloomberg as “a ‘wreck’.” 

This failure has reportedly forced a complete reconstruction of the assistant, with a former Apple executive telling the Financial Times that it was clear the assistant needed to be rebuilt entirely rather than incrementally improved.

The strategic shift at Amazon also includes a fundamental change to its business model. The company officially announced Alexa+ in February with a new subscription plan, priced at $19.99 per month but included at no extra cost for Prime members. This move signals an end to the era of voice assistants as loss-leaders for e-commerce and a direct attempt to monetize the costly development of advanced AI.

A Crowded and Aggressive Battlefield

While Amazon and Apple capture headlines with their contrasting fortunes, the competitive landscape for AI assistants is rapidly intensifying. Google has been steadily integrating its Gemini AI across its ecosystem, rolling out its conversational Gemini Live assistant to Google Workspace accounts in May. The company has focused on deep integration with productivity tools, enabling multimodal interactions using a device’s camera and on-screen content.

Meanwhile, other major players are staking their claims. OpenAI, whose technology is helping power some of these new experiences, has expanded its own ChatGPT Advanced Voice Mode to the web. The company is also reportedly planning to build a ‘super assistant’ with advanced agentic capabilities and, through its acquisition of Jony Ive’s hardware firm io, signals a long-term ambition to create AI-native devices that could one day challenge the iPhone itself.

Anthropic, a key partner for Amazon, launched a voice mode for its own Claude AI in late May, entering the assistant arena directly. Even smaller startups like Perplexity are in the mix, launching an AI voice assistant on iOS and securing a pre-installation partnership with Motorola. Samsung is reportedly close to a deal with Perplexity AI that could see its assistant replace Google Gemini on the Galaxy S26.

Apple’s recent WWDC 2025 announcements were seen by some as a stopgap measure, deepening its partnership with OpenAI to bridge the capabilities gap while its internal Siri overhaul continues. Investors were less convinced by the presentation, which was perceived as reflecting a lackluster AI strategy compared to the aggressive moves of its rivals.

The Immense Challenge of Integration

The road to a smarter assistant is fraught with technical difficulties for everyone. Amazon’s Alexa+ launch was itself delayed from a planned 2024 release due to performance issues and the complexities of building on an existing platform. A significant portion of the active user base will be unable to use the new features without upgrading their hardware. To accelerate its development, Amazon made a multi-billion-dollar investment to integrate Claude AI into its system.

Apple’s challenges, however, appear more fundamental. The decision to build on Siri’s old foundation led to persistent bugs, with one employee saying that “fixing one issue often caused three more to appear.” This has resulted in a cascade of public setbacks, from phantom restaurant reservations to a $95 million settlement over allegations of hidden user recordings.

Apple Senior Vice President Craig Federighi acknowledged the delay, stating the company needed “more time to meet our high-quality bar” and pushing the anticipated launch potentially into 2026.

A core part of Apple’s struggle is its strategic commitment to on-device processing for user privacy. This restrained approach stands in contrast to the aggressive, cloud-based strategies of rivals like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft. This privacy-first stance may limit its ability to leverage the vast cloud-based datasets that fuel the rapid learning of its competitors’ models.

The Inevitable Shift to Monetization

Amazon’s bet on a subscription model is a pivotal moment for the voice assistant market, but it is not happening in a vacuum. The immense cost of developing and running large language models is forcing a reckoning across the industry. A 2025 trends report from Mary Meeker’s Bond Capital highlights the massive cash burn of leading AI labs, underscoring the urgent need for sustainable revenue.

This financial pressure is why nearly every major player is erecting a paywall for their best features. Microsoft is a notable exception, making its advanced Copilot voice interactions completely free, a move that puts additional pressure on Amazon’s model. However, the broader trend is clear. A 2025 report from Chargebee found that companies embracing AI alongside innovative pricing models are nearly twice as likely to achieve high growth. 

From Commands to True Conversation

Ultimately, the goal for all these companies is to evolve assistants from simple command-and-control tools into intuitive, conversational partners. This technological shift is about creating proactive, context-aware agents that can anticipate user needs. As a blog post from ElevenLabs explains, “AI voice agents are shifting from reactive to proactive—anticipating user needs and offering solutions before they’re asked.” This evolution has massive business implications, as Gartner predicts that by 2026, conversational AI in contact centers will reduce agent labor costs by $80 billion.

Early feedback on Alexa+ suggests it is moving in the right direction, though it remains a work in progress. A USA Today columnist who gained access was largely complimentary, writing that they had “been very pleased – and occasionally quite impressed.”

A Reddit user noted that “It’s early days, but it feels a tiny bit closer to what I have with ChatGPT”. However, the early version is missing several promised features and has introduced new frustrations. Users have reported that the new AI sometimes fails to control smart home devices, like an air fryer, that the “classic” Alexa handled with ease. This illustrates the delicate balance between adding new conversational intelligence and maintaining the reliable, deterministic control that users have come to expect.

The race to create the next generation of AI assistants is a marathon defined by deep technical debt, immense financial investment, and a rapidly shifting competitive landscape. While Amazon is slowly but surely getting its product into the hands of users, Apple is engaged in a high-stakes, foundational reset. The divergent paths of these two giants, set against a backdrop of aggressive moves from Google and OpenAI, will ultimately determine whose voice will define the future of human-computer interaction.

Markus Kasanmascheff
Markus Kasanmascheff
Markus has been covering the tech industry for more than 15 years. He is holding a Master´s degree in International Economics and is the founder and managing editor of Winbuzzer.com.

Recent News

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
We would love to hear your opinion! Please comment below.x
()
x