Google is escalating competition in AI-assisted coding by introducing Gemini Code Assist Free, a free-tier version of its AI-powered coding assistant.
This expansion directly challenges GitHub Copilot Free, Microsoft’s AI coding tool, by offering dramatically higher usage limits—180,000 completions per month compared to Copilot’s 2,000. The move signals Google’s intent to make AI-powered coding more widely accessible while drawing developers into its ecosystem.
Microsoft has been strengthening its AI development tools, most notably by recently integrating Copilot into Apple’s Xcode, expanding its reach beyond Visual Studio Code. Meanwhile, Anthropic, backed by Google and Amazon, just entered the race with the new Claude Code Assistant, offering an alternative AI model focused on reasoning and problem-solving rather than direct code generation.
Google’s Strategy: From Enterprise to Free AI Coding
Initially launched as a paid service for enterprise users, Gemini Code Assist is designed to integrate deeply with Google Cloud services, automating code generation and debugging. By expanding access with a free-tier version, Google is making a direct bid for individual developers who might otherwise use Copilot.
Gemini Code Assist Free supports multiple IDEs, including JetBrains, Visual Studio Code, and GitHub. Unlike Copilot Free, which limits usage and AI interactions, Google’s version allows for full-function generation with fewer restrictions. However, the company has not clarified whether this free version runs on its latest Gemini AI model or an earlier iteration, creating some uncertainty regarding its full capabilities.
How Gemini Code Assist Free Compares to GitHub Copilot Free
Google’s new offering differs from Microsoft’s Copilot Free in both scope and access. Copilot Free, which is deeply embedded in the GitHub and Visual Studio Code ecosystem, offers 2,000 code completions per month and 50 AI-powered chat interactions.
In contrast, Gemini Code Assist Free provides 180,000 completions, making it a more attractive option for developers requiring higher usage limits.

GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke described the reasoning behind the company’s free-tier offering, stating: “We have free [GitHub] Actions entitlements. I think at my first Universe [conference] as CEO, we announced free Codespaces. And so it felt natural, at some point, to get to the point where we also have a completely free Copilot, not just one that is for students and open-source maintainers.”
While Copilot Free maintains a strong advantage due to its deep integration with GitHub repositories and Microsoft development tools, Gemini Code Assist’s more flexible usage model presents a compelling alternative for developers working across multiple platforms.
Microsoft Expands Copilot with Xcode Integration
In addition to its free-tier offering, Microsoft has recently extended Copilot’s reach by integrating it into Apple’s Xcode, making AI-generated code completions accessible to macOS developers. This move aligns with Microsoft’s broader strategy of embedding AI deeper into professional development environments, reinforcing Copilot’s presence across multiple platforms.
The decision to extend Copilot into Xcode highlights Microsoft’s ongoing efforts to compete with Google and ensure that developers using Apple’s ecosystem do not migrate to alternative AI coding assistants. However, the limitations of Copilot’s free plan remain a potential barrier to adoption compared to Google’s more generous approach.
Anthropic’s Claude Code Assistant: A Different AI Model
While Google and Microsoft focus on AI-generated code completions, Anthropic has taken a different approach with its new Claude Code Assistant. Rather than optimizing for code prediction, Claude is built for reasoning-based assistance, making it better suited for debugging, software architecture discussions, and multi-step problem-solving.
The underlying new Claude 3.7 Sonnet model features a hybrid reasoning system that adapts response times based on task complexity. This allows it to offer concise coding assistance for simple queries while generating detailed responses for complex programming issues. While it lacks the IDE integration seen in Copilot and Gemini Code Assist, its ability to analyze and refine code logic gives it a unique advantage for developers handling intricate projects.
Why AI Coding Assistants Are Becoming Free
The aggressive push for free AI coding assistants is not just about accessibility—it is a strategic move to lock developers into specific AI ecosystems. Microsoft’s Copilot Free plan ensures that developers working within GitHub and Visual Studio Code stay within its ecosystem. Google, by offering a more generous free-tier alternative, is positioning Gemini AI as a competing standard, likely aiming to convert free users into paying customers for its broader AI and cloud services.
Anthropic, with its backing from Google and Amazon, represents an alternative path, focusing less on code prediction and more on AI-assisted reasoning. By entering the market with a different approach, it could attract developers who need more than just code completion—potentially carving out a niche in AI-driven software planning and debugging.
AI-assisted coding is no longer just about speeding up development—it is about redefining the way software is built. Google, Microsoft, and Anthropic are each pursuing distinct strategies, but the long-term impact will depend on which platform developers choose to rely on.
As these AI models and tools continue to improve, the debate will surely shift from which tool offers the best free-tier benefits to how AI can fundamentally change software engineering practices.
Table: AI Model Benchmarks – LLM Leaderboard
[table “18” not found /]Last Updated on March 3, 2025 11:28 am CET