The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has proposed forcing Google to sell its Chrome browser and make major changes to Android, sparking an intense response from the tech giant.
In a reaction Google has labeled the demands a threat to user privacy, security, and its ability to drive innovation. The move follows a major antitrust ruling earlier this year that found Google guilty of leveraging exclusive deals to cement its dominance in search.
Google’s Stance: Security, Privacy, and AI Concerns
Google argues that the DOJ’s measures would expose millions of users to potential risks by forcing the company to share sensitive technologies and personal search data with other companies, including international firms.
Kent Walker, Google’s Chief Legal Officer, stated that these proposals would “endanger the security and privacy of millions of Americans, and undermine the quality of products people love, by forcing the sale of Chrome and potentially Android,” and compromise product quality.
The proposed remedies include establishing an external committee to oversee Google’s search algorithms and product updates. Such oversight, Google warns, could lead to micromanagement and disrupt how its search tools evolve.
Additionally, the company highlighted the risks of fragmenting its Android ecosystem, which could complicate app security and updates for users.
Antitrust Origins: Exclusive Deals Under Fire
The DOJ’s push stems from a ruling in August 2024, when Judge Amit Mehta determined that Google violated antitrust laws by using exclusive contracts to dominate the search market.
These deals included payments of up to $20 billion annually to Apple for making Google Search the default option on iPhones. The decision cited Google’s control of more than 90% of the search market, with Microsoft’s Bing trailing at just 6%.
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella testified that even a $100 billion investment in Bing wouldn’t overcome Google’s strategic advantage gained through these contracts. Such agreements, the ruling argued, prevented fair competition and stifled alternatives.
|
Related: |
Chrome and Android’s Role in Google’s Ecosystem
Chrome, which accounts for over two-thirds of the global browser market, is at the center of the DOJ’s proposed remedies. Regulators argue that Chrome’s integration with Google Search reinforces its market dominance, locking out competitors and limiting user choice.
Similarly, Android, which powers most of the world’s smartphones, plays a key role in Google’s ecosystem. By tying Android to Google’s search and advertising services, the company ensures its products remain dominant. However, unbundling Android, Google warns, could lead to inconsistent experiences across devices and undermine security protocols.
AI Innovation and Publisher Disputes
The DOJ’s plan also threatens Google’s AI efforts, including its Gemini model, which powers search summaries and predictive tools. These features, branded as “AI summaries,” provide instant insights but have drawn criticism from publishers, who argue they divert traffic from original content.
Google has countered that AI integration enhances user experience and search efficiency. The DOJ is reportedly considering rules allowing publishers to block their content from appearing in AI summaries without affecting their search visibility.
Broader Implications: Mozilla and App Stores
Mozilla’s Firefox browser, a smaller competitor to Chrome, could lose significant funding if Google is required to terminate its search placement deals. These agreements account for a large portion of Mozilla’s revenue, supporting its ability to compete in the browser market.
Additionally, Google is dealing with separate legal challenges, including an October 2024 ruling in favor of Epic Games. This decision mandates that Google allow third-party app stores on Android and permit developers to bypass its payment system, which takes a 30% cut of in-app purchases. Google is appealing the ruling, arguing it undermines app security and user trust.
As legal pressures mount, Google has reshuffled its leadership. Nick Fox, a long-time executive, now leads its search and ads division, replacing Prabhakar Raghavan. Fox faces the dual challenge of maintaining user trust while responding to regulatory scrutiny and growing competition from rivals like Amazon and emerging platforms such as TikTok.
